Approaching An Organized Electoral Cliff

 

cliff-post1

So here we are standing in the dark. We’re unsure if the next step is a off of a cliff, or just another step onto uneven ground. Let’s conduct a brief review of the recent circumstances that led us to this point.

  1. Donald Trump won the election based on the electoral college numbers.
  2. Hillary Clinton lost the election but appears to have won the popular vote.
  3. Clinton supporters tried protest/rioting to get their way, it failed so far.
  4. Clinton supporters made threats towards the Electoral College electors to get them to change their vote for Trump.
  5. Clinton supporters said the Russians hacked the election machines.
  6. Clinton’s people convinced Jill Stein (Green party) to demand a recount, but only in the major states that Trump won, and where the count was relatively close.
  7. Clinton supporters said that the Russians are the ones who hacked Clinton’s email, thus producing all the Wikileak documentation that was disseminated.
  8. Clinton supporters are now saying Trump’s win is illegitimate, due to Russian interference.
  9. Clinton supporters are now trying to imply that the Electors need to look at a “Secret” CIA report/briefing to decide if they should follow through on their commitment to vote for the winner of the election.

First, Yes, according to the electoral rules, Donald Trump is the President Elect. The Electoral College was created to make the votes of a less populated state more equal to that of a heavily populated state.

Second, Although it appears that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote, it is also apparent that there is a very good possibility that the only reason she won the popular vote was due to the millions of “Illegals” that were encouraged to vote by numerous liberals including the President. The likely reality is that Clinton did not win the popular vote. There are numerous examples of voter fraud on the Democrat side, and it’s not just due to the “Illegals” voting. In one case in Detroit, it was reported that one area had 50 people cast votes, but it had 306 votes counted.

Third, Groups across the country decided they were going to protest/riot the Trump win. Although I have never seen Conservatives start a riot, we have seen plenty of Liberals and their lackeys (those that don’t care have a political mindset, they just want a reason/endorsement to commit violence) not just protest, but start violent riots. What does the President do when these riots break out? If he acknowledges it, he will usually make excuses about issues that need addressed, or some such drive.

When police involved shootings have taken place, the President has usually taken the wrong side (the person proven later to be a criminal), saying some drivel like, “If I had a son, he’d look like Fill in the blank (Thug).” What did he say about the violence due to the Trump election win?

“I would not advise people who feel strongly or are concerned about some of the issues that have been raised over the course of the campaign, I would not advise them to be silent”

The bottom line is that the Soros led elitist endorsed and funded the protest/riots didn’t work. When a group that is dedicated to violence like Black Lives Matter is bused into an area specifically to cause protests and violence (how many times in the last two years have we seen this?), you know an organized agenda is at work. Fortunately for the rioters, they didn’t and don’t conduct their “violent tantrums” in an area that is heavily conservative. The outcome might have been “Less than optimal” for the malicious participants.

Fourth, We’ve heard numerous reports from Electoral College electors, saying that they have been threatened with violence if they voted for Trump on December 19th. I believe this tactic had the exact opposite effect on the Electors who planned on doing what they are mandated to do in the Electoral College on December 19th. I believe that as many threats as they might have received, the Electors probably received more messages of support from those that refuse to allow our election process to be subverted (Conservatives).

Fifth, So the Russians hacked the election machines huh? Well, considering that the only verified attempted hacking that appears to have happened during that time frame was from DHS into individual State systems (reports from numerous State AG’s). There were plenty of examples of voting machines changing votes. Ironically, all the examples I observed (people videoing their vote) changed votes for Trump to Clinton. I’d love to see one example of a machine that changed a vote from Clinton to Trump. I can pretty much guarantee it doesn’t exist though.

Sixth, The recount demanded by Jill Stein (an apparent Clinton surrogate) was an obvious nefarious tactic designed to negate the electoral votes from the states that Trump won but had totals on both sides, which in election numbers, were relatively close. This attempt was designed to make those state electoral votes (representing the cast ballots) void because they were trying to keep them from being finished the count by a December ballot certification deadline. The courts apparently decided Stein’s recount bid had no merit, and put a stop to it.

Seventh, So the Russians are the ones who hacked the illegal private server of Hillary Clinton (how many times was she caught lying to Congress about it?) huh? Julian Assange of Wikileaks has specifically said that the Russians had nothing to do with the info that he received, and he would be the guy to know.

“Our source is not the Russian government,” Assange told “The Sean Hannity Show.”

I mentioned the other day that I believed the info came from a Sanders supporter from inside the DNC. I didn’t figure this out for myself. A friend mentioned it to me a few days ago and I felt it made the most sense. This takes into consideration that Clinton stole the election from Sanders (primary) long before she tried to steal it from Trump.

Considering that the President originally said that an election hack was ridiculous back in October in response to a Trump statement,

“There is no serious person out there who would suggest that you could even rig America’s elections, in part because they are so decentralized. There is no evidence that that has happened in the past, or that there are instances that that could happen this time, So I’d advise Mr. Trump to stop whining, and go make his case to get votes.”

But now he is talking about taking action against another world power for doing what the U.S. CIA had done numerous times around the globe. Here’s two ironic quotes,

President Obama said on Thursday that the United States would retaliate for Russia’s efforts to influence the presidential election, asserting that ‘we need to take action,’ and ‘we will’.”

“I think there is no doubt that when any foreign government tries to impact the integrity of our election, we need to take action. And we will — at the time and place of our choosing.”

It’s entirely too ironic, considering that the President personally took part and is still participating in decisions to destroy the sitting governments in a number of middle eastern countries, and used his politicized CIA to do it. Something else that’s ironic….. I guess this means that FBI Director Comey must be a Russian agent, since he is the one that brought up the last email info release to Congress at about the most critical moment in the election cycle possible, and none of the Clinton apologists can deny any of the info in the emails are true.

Eighth, Saying that Trump’s win is illegitimate, due to supposed interference by the Russians, is a last ditch attempt by the Elites to steal the election from President Elect Donald Trump. I find the Russian response to the accusation hilarious and ominous at the same time,

“Presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov said it was ‘indecent’ of the United States to ‘groundlessly’ accuse Russia of intervention in the US election campaign, Russian state news agency Tass reported.
‘They should either stop talking about that or produce some proof at last. Otherwise it all begins to look unseemly’.”
To paraphrase, “Put up or shut up!” The admin is saying that Putin supposedly took personal charge of the “election op”. They are putting out info that apparently came from a politicized segment of the CIA . Putin is not one of the typical “gutless” world leaders, so in this case they might want to tread lightly. Of course this administration and the Clinton campaign have done everything possible for years to throw out rhetoric which is meant to “poke the bear”. This most recent action is “par for the course”, and goes right along with what they want to happen.

Ninth, The Electoral College electors are not in a position to receive any briefing from the CIA. They are not supposed to be politicians bent on making a decision about how to cast their vote. The only deciding factor they are supposed to use in determining the way their vote is cast is by picking the person the state they represent voted for. The Electors aren’t cleared for info that the CIA would divulge, whether it’s legitimate or not. The ones who think they “deserve” to hear the info are “Baking a cake” they were only meant to “Lick the icing” of.

Parting thoughts, I was not a fan of Trump at the initial onset of the election. Here’s the funny thing about that though. Every time the Democrap Clinton campaign opened its collectivists mouth, I liked him a little more. Every time the “Republicant” RINO elitists opened their mouths to try and discredit Trump, I liked him even more.  If this group of politicized miscreants (the Electors playing political games) are able to steal this election, (and make no joke it would be a theft) it’s just final proof that we inhabit a Banana Republic, and American rule of law is dead.

What you decide to do if that incident occurs is up to you. Whether you like it or not, wargaming this scenario and deciding your response to it is what responsible Americans do. We do not wish for it to occur, but that is immaterial to the facts that face us. Prepare to protect your family. Prepare to protect you community (remember the paid anarchists are still out there and willing to do whatever the elitists need done). Prepare to defend the original standards, precepts and morals that this country was founded on and that which defines us as Americans. If the global elitists (make no mistake, that’s exactly who is doing this) win this fight and don’t receive an appropriate response from the “Deplorables”, we are done as Americans. The elitists are starting to lose their stranglehold in some areas of the world, and that is making them more desperate than ever. Rat’s are always most dangerous when cornered, and from another angle, they were the transport of the fleas which spread the bubonic plague.

from-the-desk-of-jc-dodge

JCD

American by BIRTH, Infidel by CHOICE

 

 

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “Approaching An Organized Electoral Cliff

  1. Solid fact finding. The same characters who blamed a video for the attacks on the consulate in Benghazi are the same ones blaming RUS. Crying wolf too many times.

  2. Brexit/Trump/Italian parliament vote/soon France and Netherlands votes,things are changing,whether trojan horses or not people awakening,will be interesting to see how it all plays out,this Monday the next stop,of course congress counting votes Jan.6 could always be another “interesting” moment.

  3. If the electoral machines were hacked or hackable the response should be to not use them or fix it. But, no official or press discussion of that has been heard by me. Soooo…

  4. “Trumped” Starring Matthew Broderick & Nathan Lane

    I had considered during the race, that Trump might have been trying to to throw it for Clinton.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s