GP325: Decision Making Considerations Before Rendering Aid

For every critical situation you find yourself in, there should always be a plan, even if it’s just a “Battle Drill”. George Patton gives some great insight into some of the considerations necessary, when making those decisions, and implementing those plans.


Oregon Lessons Learned – Or – Lessons You Better Learn

Regular readers know that I am a huge advocate of local preparation and execution.

There will be times though when other groups will call for aid and support.

You might be inclined to assist. Today, we’ll discuss some criteria to help you decide if you want to or should provide support.

Will leaving your local area leave you and your tribe at risk?

  • Your number one priority is you, your family, and your local area.  Do you have enough trained members of your group to send some of them somewhere else?
  • It’s the same thing with logistics. Do you have access to extra supplies?  You should never give your core supplies to someone else

Do the folks that you are going to assist have a clear statement of why they are taking the action? Does it have an obtainable end state? In other words, have they defined success?

  • A good objective needs to be getting the middle 40% of America to see us as not evil. We shouldn’t expect then to love our cause, but certainly they need to see that we are being wronged.  If we can show the government as overbearing and overreaching, we win.

Another thing to consider is whether or not you have local support.

  • It doesn’t matter if the liberty event is in the middle of BLM controlled land, or in a town with a tyrannical sheriff, or something else. If the locals are happy with the atrocities or evilness, we are wasting your time with an occupation.
  • In Oregon, it’s not that the locals are ambivalent. They are overwhelmingly against the occupation.  The Hammonds, who are claimed to be one of the reasons for the occupation, are adamant in their statements that they don’t support the occupation.  And other than Tom Baugh, no one seems to be talking about how to help the Hammond family as they try to make it with while their bread-winners are in prison.
  • Stealing government vehicles and driving them around town, destroying government property, and otherwise causing the taxpayer who actually owns the stuff to have to pay for repairs, sends a terrible message to the locals.
  • In Oregon, there was an outstanding opportunity to seize the high ground by protecting the historical artifacts, but it seems that they took the ISIS approach to the artifacts.
  • Remember that the locals lived there before we got there and will live there after we leave.
  • Quite frankly, other than the lack of logistical support, this was the thing that I found so bizarre with the Jedburgh concept. The notion that some folks would get together from God knows where and show up in my locality seemed bizarre. I always figured that they would be shot on contact.

Consider who you are going to support.

  • Someone else started the fight. If you go to help, you won’t be in charge and will have to willingly follow their rules. If you can’t do that, you best not go. If the group in question gets a bad reputation, you will too, just for having been there.
  • If you don’t know them at all, but think the objective is strong, and there is local support, be cautious and be prepared to disengage if you have to.  Plan your own exit strategy from the beginning.

Do the folks conducting the action have a comprehensive public relations plan?

  • Obviously, if there isn’t a clear objective, it’s hard to garner support. However, even if you have a clear objective, it is critical that you keep the locals informed of your daily actions and what is being done (or should be done) to achieve your end state.
  • A media center is very important.   The message needs to be consistent and professional.  As the situation develops, there may be a time where you can’t talk to the media directly.  Consider the use of “pirate radio” to get your message out to the masses.

What logistical support are the fighters depending on?

  • Assuming that a clear objective was established and local support was available, the planners must have an idea of how long the fight is going to last.  They must show up with enough supplies to last for the initial estimate, and develop a plan for resupply

In conclusion, choosing to support an effort with “boots on the ground” requires some serious thinking.

  • If you can’t leave your local area, you shouldn’t go at all.
  • If you can leave your local area, but have no access to extra logistical supplies, you shouldn’t go at all.
  • If you can leave your local area and you do have extra supplies, but the folks doing the action have no clear objective or feasible end state, you shouldn’t go at all.
  • If you can meet all of the criteria, but the action is in a place where there is no local support at best, or the locals are hostile at worst, you shouldn’t go at all.

It’s time to remember that it’s all local.


Remember SMB’s words “Keep it local. Keep it sane. Keep it military. Keep it disciplined.”.


American by BIRTH, Infidel by CHOICE


2 thoughts on “GP325: Decision Making Considerations Before Rendering Aid

  1. Hi JC,
    As Holmes would say,’Elementary, my dear Watson!!” However well put!!!! I Concur!! Just remember,”No more ‘Free Waco’s and Ruby Ridges!!!!!” Those in and of themselves were too much!!!!!! In Parting, I will leave you with a post from the website “The Last Refuge” the post is titled “Cold Anger” 27SEP2015 by Sundance…..There will be a “Reckoning!!!”
    Confederate by Birth, Infidel by the notion of some Raghead Pedophyle!!
    Got Gunz……OUTLAW!!!!!!!,

  2. I’d like to point out that this entire staged event in Oregon was never a “Waco”. Oregon is a group of armed felons and pissed off cowboys who set out to cross state lines and knowingly commit several federal felony’s. Waco was a religious cult “raided” on a falsified federal warrant , who were then murdered in there own home for saying “NO” and defending themselves AND THERE HOME from a paramilitary attack. “Ruby Ridge” Was a knuckle head neonazi who KNOWINGLY committed AT LEAST five federal felony’s in the two years before the USMS “Raid”, that turned into the Charlie Foxtrot, that brought in the FBI HRT and got his family members killed. This BS in Oregon isn’t ether one. You should Thank what ever G_D you believe in that the III% and Oath Keepers didn’t fall for this trap.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s